Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Шоу: 20 | 50 | 100
Результаты 1 - 6 de 6
Фильтр
1.
J Emerg Med ; 63(1): e31-e33, 2022 07.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2309864

Реферат

BACKGROUND: The mass immunization campaign against Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in more patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with concern for a vaccine reaction. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old man presented to the ED reporting an allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine. He initially noted swelling of his face, neck, and right arm after receiving the first dose of the vaccine. After his second dose of the vaccine, the swelling became more pronounced and prompted him to seek care. On examination, he had fullness of the neck and engorgement of the left external jugular vein, which were exacerbated when the patient raised his arms above his head, consistent with Pemberton's sign. Apart from the swelling of the head and neck, there were no other findings consistent with an allergic reaction. The presence of Pemberton's sign prompted a computed tomography scan of the chest with contrast, which revealed a paratracheal mass measuring 4.5 × 2.0 cm with marked narrowing of the superior vena cava (SVC). The patient was admitted to the hospital for SVC syndrome, and further workup revealed a non-small cell lung cancer. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Patients may misattribute their symptoms to a COVID vaccine reaction when they are, in fact, experiencing a more serious underlying disease. This case highlights the importance of a thorough physical examination and maintaining a broad differential diagnosis. In this case, the presence of Pemberton's sign raised suspicion for SVC syndrome, and prompted further workup.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Hypersensitivity , Lung Neoplasms , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/diagnosis , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/etiology , Vena Cava, Superior
2.
J Emerg Med ; 62(2): e20-e22, 2022 02.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2159244

Реферат

BACKGROUND: Resistance bands commonly used for strength training exercise come with an unexpected risk for ocular trauma. CASE REPORT: In this report, we describe an unintended consequence of a 28-year-old man sustaining an unusual injury-bilateral hyphema-as a result of the use of elastic resistance bands. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Resistance bands are commonly used for strength training exercise and, in this case, a potentially severe, vision-threatening injury-traumatic hyphema-occurred. Traumatic hyphema occurs when blood pools in the anterior chamber of the eye, usually as the result of blunt force trauma or penetrating injury. Early recognition of this condition is imperative, as complications of traumatic hyphema, such as intraocular hypertension or rebleeding, can lead to permanent vision loss.


Тема - темы
Eye Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Wounds, Penetrating , Adult , Exercise , Eye Injuries/complications , Humans , Hyphema/complications , Male , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Penetrating/complications
3.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266148, 2022.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1789182

Реферат

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Facemask use is associated with reduced transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Most surveys assessing perceptions and practices of mask use miss the most vulnerable racial, ethnic, and socio-economic populations. These same populations have suffered disproportionate impacts from the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess beliefs, access, and practices of mask wearing across 15 urban emergency department (ED) populations. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of ED patients from December 2020 to March 2021 at 15 geographically diverse, safety net EDs across the US. The primary outcome was frequency of mask use outside the home and around others. Other outcome measures included having enough masks and difficulty obtaining them. RESULTS: Of 2,575 patients approached, 2,301 (89%) agreed to participate; nine had missing data pertaining to the primary outcome, leaving 2,292 included in the final analysis. A total of 79% of respondents reported wearing masks "all of the time" and 96% reported wearing masks over half the time. Subjects with PCPs were more likely to report wearing masks over half the time compared to those without PCPs (97% vs 92%). Individuals experiencing homelessness were less likely to wear a mask over half the time compared to those who were housed (81% vs 96%). CONCLUSIONS: Study participants reported high rates of facemask use. Respondents who did not have PCPs and those who were homeless were less likely to report wearing a mask over half the time and more likely to report barriers in obtaining masks. The ED may serve a critical role in education regarding, and provision of, masks for vulnerable populations.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Masks , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 56: 63-70, 2022 06.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1757044

Реферат

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic was superimposed upon an ongoing epidemic of opioid use disorder and overdose deaths. Although the trend of opioid prescription patterns (OPP) had decreased in response to public health efforts before the pandemic, little is known about the OPP from emergency department (ED) clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post study of adult patients who were discharged from 13 EDs and one urgent care within our academic medical system between 01/01/2019 and 09/30/2020 using an interrupted time series (ITS) approach. Patient characteristics and prescription data were extracted from the single unified electronic medical record across all study sites. Prescriptions of opioids were converted into morphine equivalent dose (MED). We compared the "Covid-19 Pandemic" period (C19, 03/29/2020-9/30/2020) and the "Pre-Pandemic" period (PP, 1/19/2020-03/28/2020). We used a multivariate logistic regression to assess clinical factors associated with opioid prescriptions. RESULTS: We analyzed 361,794 ED visits by adult patients, including 259,242 (72%) PP and 102,552 (28%) C19 visits. Demographic information and percentages of patients receiving opioid prescriptions were similar in both groups. The median [IQR] MED per prescription was higher for C19 patients (70 [56-90]) than for PP patients (60 [60-90], P < 0.001). ITS demonstrated a significant trend toward higher MED prescription per ED visit during the pandemic (coefficient 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.16, P = 0.002). A few factors, that were associated with lower likelihood of opioid prescriptions before the pandemic, became non-significant during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that emergency clinicians increased the prescribed amount of opioids per prescription during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Etiologies for this finding could include lack of access to primary care and other specialties during the pandemic, or lower volumes allowing for emergency clinicians to identify who is safe to be prescribed opioids.


Тема - темы
Analgesics, Opioid , COVID-19 , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Pandemics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
5.
Ann Emerg Med ; 78(4): 502-510, 2021 10.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1252441

Реферат

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) often serve vulnerable populations who may lack primary care and have suffered disproportionate COVID-19 pandemic effects. Comparing patients having and lacking a regular source of medical care and other ED patient characteristics, we assessed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reasons for not wanting the vaccine, perceived access to vaccine sites, and willingness to get the vaccine as part of ED care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey conducted from December 10, 2020, to March 7, 2021, at 15 safety net US EDs. Primary outcomes were COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reasons for vaccine hesitancy, and sites (including EDs) for potential COVID-19 vaccine receipt. RESULTS: Of 2,575 patients approached, 2,301 (89.4%) participated. Of the 18.4% of respondents who lacked a regular source of medical care, 65% used the ED as their usual source of health care. The overall rate of vaccine hesitancy was 39%; the range among the 15 sites was 28% to 58%. Respondents who lacked a regular source of medical care were more commonly vaccine hesitant than those who had a regular source of medical care (47% versus 38%, 9% difference, 95% confidence interval 4% to 14%). Other characteristics associated with greater vaccine hesitancy were younger age, female sex, Black race, Latinx ethnicity, and not having received an influenza vaccine in the past 5 years. Of the 61% who would accept a COVID-19 vaccine, 21% stated that they lacked a primary physician or clinic at which to receive it; the vast majority (95%) of these respondents would accept the COVID-19 vaccine as part of their care in the ED. CONCLUSION: ED patients who lack a regular source of medical care are particularly hesitant regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Most COVID-19 vaccine acceptors would accept it as part of their care in the ED. EDs may play pivotal roles in COVID-19 vaccine messaging and delivery to highly vulnerable populations.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Services Accessibility , Vaccination Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Vulnerable Populations , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(10): 2243.e5-2243.e6, 2020 Oct.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-342708

Реферат

Patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus can present with a wide variety of symptoms including being entirely asymptomatic. Despite having no or minimal symptoms, some patients may have markedly reduced pulse oximetry readings. This has been referred to as "silent" or "apathetic" hypoxia (Ottestad et al., 2020 [1]). We present a case of a 72-year-old male with COVID-19 syndrome who presented to the emergency department with minimal symptoms but low peripheral oxygen saturation readings. The patient deteriorated over the following days and eventually died as a result of overwhelming multi-organ system failure. This case highlights the utility of peripheral oxygen measurements in the evaluation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Self-monitoring of pulse oximetry by patients discharged from the emergency department is a potential way to identify patients needing to return for further evaluation.


Тема - темы
COVID-19/diagnosis , Clinical Deterioration , Hypoxia/diagnosis , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Hypoxia/etiology , Male , SARS-CoV-2
Критерии поиска